## New Research In

### Physical Sciences

#### Featured Portals

#### Articles by Topic

### Social Sciences

#### Featured Portals

#### Articles by Topic

### Biological Sciences

#### Featured Portals

#### Articles by Topic

- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- 从三个维度理解 宏观政策对市场的影响
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- 针对“亿三恋” 晶电/木林森“合体”开拓印度LED照明商机
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology

# Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter

- 小市场成劣质家居庇护所 品牌信息普遍缺失
- Find this author on PubMed
- 指定二手房评估机构 北京公积金中心涉垄断被查

- 深圳新房10月成交量环比增54% 价格无明显上涨
- Find this author on PubMed
- 通州公积金贷款业务增多 房产业务员连夜排队

- 卫浴行业打响升级战 未来谁是“弄潮儿”
- Find this author on PubMed
- 人口普查将“查房”是要收房产税？官媒辟谣
- 发改委出文规范电商市场 地板企业征战双11如何取胜？
- For correspondence: mietek.szyszkowicz@canada.ca

- 7月房价涨幅再收窄：一线城市降温 二线城市发力
- Find this author on PubMed
- 环渤海家具产业园落户河北汉沽管理区

- 贵州首家全宅智能家居体验中心 智能化装修设计
- Find this author on PubMed
- 各地物业纠纷呈上升恶化趋势 专家:关系待重构

- 微信推广或能让涂料行业“火”起来
- Find this author on PubMed
- 投资房地产信托不能单纯信抵押物

- 智能家居或成黑客新猎物:可能带来物理伤害
- Find this author on PubMed
- 个人开发无人岛的相关政策进一步明确 当“岛主”的机会来了？

- 木塑复合材料：绿色建筑的领头羊
- Find this author on PubMed
- 爱屋吉屋拿钱后经纪人玩失踪 骗租客签约拒退费
- 北京房贷发放数据连降五季度

- “驰名商标”标准模糊 家居建材将启用星级品牌评价制
- Find this author on PubMed
- 废钢税务专项稽查或延续到8月下旬 价格易涨难跌

- 《中国流动人口发展报告2018》发布：流动人口规模进入调整期
- Find this author on PubMed
- 新政降息促楼市入夏 54城成交量环比增8%

- 照明行业“转型”面临三大“挑战”
- Find this author on PubMed
- 滴滴顺风车重新上线 车主接单需人脸识别

- 京城二手房回暖明显 房东捂房惜售重返市场
- Find this author on PubMed
- 杭州二手房年度报告：本地挂牌人占比近九成

- 交通银行：小康家庭不动产投资意愿升至景气区间
- Find this author on PubMed
- 家居租赁商业模式为何变成非法集资骗局？

- 买二手房不立即过户风险大 最好别全款买房
- Find this author on PubMed
- 报告称2016年房价将再涨7% 地价涨10%

- 陶瓷企业面临欧盟最终裁决 广西陶瓷打响“出口保卫战”
- Find this author on PubMed
- 居家养老服务应追求“最适宜”

- 推进改革开放创新增进民生福祉促进经济社会持续健康发展
- Find this author on PubMed
- 淋浴房市场三大发展特征 智能化是趋势

- 一线城市拿地门槛高抬 房企参与旧改力争多赢
- Find this author on PubMed
- 智慧城市政策支持 装饰物联网大有可为

- 二线城市房价跨越式涨价 热点区域直逼北京房价
- Find this author on PubMed
- 首条智能打标生产线投产 拉开家具建材智造序幕

- 人口老龄化阶段 老年家居市场的空白亟需填补
- Find this author on PubMed
- 钢贸风险延北方 山东博金钢铁陷漩涡
- 住建部取缔5个违法违规高尔夫球场 2个系万达投资

- 房企“地产+”转型难寻坦途
- Find this author on PubMed
- 市场反应冷淡？消费者还未明白智能家居便利性

- 石家庄LED灯占领大半市场 高性价比价格更亲民
- Find this author on PubMed
- 香港恒生指数收涨1.76% 报29562.02点

- 房价未来上涨空间有限 供大于求整体格局未变
- Find this author on PubMed
- 地产信托暂停？多家信托公司称未收到通知

- 8月份楼市成交量继续分化 "金九银十"或难现
- Find this author on PubMed
- 总投资337亿元 52个“京”字项目落地北三县

- 绿色建材满天飞 装修市场多李鬼
- Find this author on PubMed
- 全球LED照明产业方兴未艾 绿色、高端是未来发展方向

- 城镇职工基本养老保险单位缴费比例再降 可降至16%
- Find this author on PubMed
- 北京城市副中心启动20余个海绵城市改造项目
- 市场反应冷淡？消费者还未明白智能家居便利性

- 城镇化或成家居建材行业发展引擎
- Find this author on PubMed
- 拒绝公积金贷款需要“硬招”出手

- 一二手房价倒挂致摇号买房蔓延 限价政策效应递减
- Find this author on PubMed
- 住建部通报：15个地方防水标准被废止

- 双11狂欢“战线”延长，给家居电商带来什么改变?
- Find this author on PubMed
- 环境诉求日益强烈 家居环保标准不断完善

- 武汉市：将稳妥推进“一城一策”试点 防范高地价高房价高杠杆风险
- Find this author on PubMed
- 欧盟限购家具外贸风险高 应对注重产品竞争力

- 地产投资增速8月终结三连跌 各地楼市将持续分化
- Find this author on PubMed
- 今年前11月广东商品房销售面积增速同比回落19.2%

- 广东省家具商会发布雅安赈灾捐赠倡议书
- Find this author on PubMed
- 首付贷产品抬高购房杠杆 业内提示违约风险

- 财政部公布2019年立法工作安排 未提及房地产税
- Find this author on PubMed
- 土地市场降温有助于调控继续深入

- 黄金周一线楼市成交趋缓 三四线楼市仍惨淡
- Find this author on PubMed
- 皇明董事长：太阳能热水器行业烂透了

- LED跨入大并购时代 揭开LED行业并购潮的“内幕”
- Find this author on PubMed
- 儿童家具安全隐患三大方面不达标

- 成都公积金新政“满月” 首套房贷办理超九成
- Find this author on PubMed
- 北京10家中介承诺不涨租金 拿出12万套存量房源

- 金九未现银十回暖 业内：房价普涨可能性很小
- Find this author on PubMed
- 郎咸平谈低迷环境下建材家居新出路

- 深圳4种人才引进业务实现“秒批”
- Find this author on PubMed
- 江西银杉白水泥：装饰环保不能舍本逐末

- 四类买房人催热楼市 专家预计6月或迎来爆发期
- Find this author on PubMed
- 儿童涂料市场受青睐 细分企业抢先机

- 化解房地产金融风险 关键在去库存
- Find this author on PubMed
- 高效集约利用土地破解空间难题

- 内蒙古严防北京建材、化工等高污染企业转移落地
- Find this author on PubMed
- 广州家具类产品销售整体回暖 年底有望延续态势

- 天津：11月起钢铁水泥行业排污须持证
- Find this author on PubMed
- 通州、朝阳等地均有二手房业主毁约涨价现象

- 聚焦一二线 融创正成为“重质发展”的地产龙头
- Find this author on PubMed
- 上半年北京GDP同比增长6.8% 保障性住房竣工4.3万套

- 财政部：2019年一季度个人所得税收入3239亿元 同比下降29.7%
- Find this author on PubMed
- 中国建材行业一周大事记（12.14-12.18）

- 农地入市焕发“沉睡”土地活力
- Find this author on PubMed
- 东莞：松山湖需求外溢 横沥二手房市场

- 养老产业正成为投资新风口
- Find this author on PubMed
- 某银行挂出178套房产！金融机构、上市公司年末集中“卖房”这是什么操作？

- 品质成LED产品出口新绿卡
- Find this author on PubMed
- 全球掀起“汰白变LED”换灯潮 飞利浦照明“身先士卒”

- 受飞利浦降价影响 LED厂东贝5月营收下滑30%
- Find this author on PubMed
- 追逐绿色建筑之梦 新型环保建材瓜分万亿市场

- 二手房新房主遭遇迁户口“死结” 政策空白待填补
- Find this author on PubMed
- 保利地产午后跌幅扩大至6% 被住建部点名违法违规

- 电商虽火热 地板电商之难他人岂知
- Find this author on PubMed
- 国家统计局：11月CPI同比增长1.7% 住房租金价格上涨2.8%

- 广西4批次水泥产品质量不合格
- Find this author on PubMed
- 降低社保费率需要“全国一盘棋”

- 房价地价倒挂 房贷利率6连降现最低值
- Find this author on PubMed
- LED“小间距+品牌”战略 两者缺一不可

- 家居卖场与电商联手可能性微乎其微
- Find this author on PubMed
- 建材4单位列“中小企业公共服务示范平台”

- 建材业如何度过产能过剩危机
- Find this author on PubMed
- 武汉市公租房轮候期间补贴发放范围扩大

- 门窗企业该转型革新还是坚守传统?
- Find this author on PubMed
- 国务院喻东：城市化梦想滋生的庞氏骗局

- 报告：中国楼市开启租赁市场万亿掘金时代

## Significance

泰勒斯威夫特被评为2012年最慈善明星。

n. 部分，份，命运，分担的责任

例如，美国和亚洲向投资者推介产品的方式存在明显区别。在亚洲，很大比例的基金（一些人估计为90%）是以佣金为基础。这对ETF不利，因为它们在股票交易所公开交易，在结构上不便向可能推荐它们的银行、券商或理财顾问支付佣金，这与该地区的共同基金行业不同。

超八成中国留学生会在国外完成学业之后归国，而2016年我国留学生的数量达到了544500人。

In an explanation released alongside the latest data, the statistics bureau credited ongoing growth in producer prices in part to coal extraction and washing prices, up 15.4 per cent for the period and accelerating 11.3 percentage points from a month earlier.

这项研究需要对夫妻互动时的情绪进行庞大的纵向研究。

7. Trust will remain the single most critical business issue.

[strein]

(Actually, JetBlue wasn’t the absolute worst airline for departure delays the last three holiday seasons. That crown went to Comair, a regional carrier for Delta Air Lines

Kate Hudson spoke to British Elle magazine exclusively for this interview。 凯特·哈德森接受了英国ELLE杂志对她的独家专访。Does actress Kate Hudson know wha

报告指出，中国网游开发商自今年年初以来一直在考虑按照时间收费。在排名前十的网络游戏中，时间收费型网游占据了4个席位，其中两款是今年才开始商业化运营的新游戏，包括盛大互动娱乐有限公司(Shanda Interactive Entertainment)的主要新游戏《永恒之塔》(AION)。Cnzz.com说，转向时间收费模式更有可能给游戏带来公平和公正感，因为玩的最好的玩家将是那些花时间最多的人，而不是那些花钱最多的用户。

What’s in a shade? If you are Pantone, the “color authority” and the dominant color trend forecaster, and you get to choose a “color of the year” every year, potentially a lot. It could include determining fashion’s direction (these are the hues that inform the fabrics that get bought by designers that get made into your clothes), influencing interiors, and even affecting how food appears. Still, I don’t think I’ve ever seen quite so much political and philosophical import attached to a color decision as I have for the 2016 “Color of the Year.”

## Abstract

Exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM_{2.5}) is a major global health concern. Quantitative estimates of attributable mortality are based on disease-specific hazard ratio models that incorporate risk information from multiple PM_{2.5} sources (outdoor and indoor air pollution from use of solid fuels and secondhand and active smoking), requiring assumptions about equivalent exposure and toxicity. We relax these contentious assumptions by constructing a PM_{2.5}-mortality hazard ratio function based only on cohort studies of outdoor air pollution that covers the global exposure range. We modeled the shape of the association between PM_{2.5} and nonaccidental mortality using data from 41 cohorts from 16 countries—the Global Exposure Mortality Model (GEMM). We then constructed GEMMs for five specific causes of death examined by the global burden of disease (GBD). The GEMM predicts 8.9 million [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.5–10.3] deaths in 2015, a figure 30% larger than that predicted by the sum of deaths among the five specific causes (6.9; 95% CI: 4.9–8.5) and 120% larger than the risk function used in the GBD (4.0; 95% CI: 3.3–4.8). Differences between the GEMM and GBD risk functions are larger for a 20% reduction in concentrations, with the GEMM predicting 220% higher excess deaths. These results suggest that PM_{2.5} exposure may be related to additional causes of death than the five considered by the GBD and that incorporation of risk information from other, nonoutdoor, particle sources leads to underestimation of disease burden, especially at higher concentrations.

Exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter (PM_{2.5}) is recognized as a major global health concern (1). In particular, both nonaccidental and cause-specific mortality have been associated with outdoor PM_{2.5} concentrations. In cohort studies, where subjects provide information on major mortality risk factors such as cigarette smoking, obesity, and occupation, estimates of outdoor PM_{2.5} exposure are assigned based on multiple year averages and followed over time to ascertain their date and underlying cause of death. The magnitude of the association between PM_{2.5} exposure and the probability of death is described by the hazard ratio (2). However, the specific shape of this association has not been identified, neither for relatively low exposures in developed Western countries nor higher exposures observed globally.

Until recently, cohort studies of outdoor PM_{2.5} and mortality were limited to areas with relatively low concentrations (<35 µg/m^{3}) compared with the entire global exposure range (3). This lack of direct evidence at higher global PM_{2.5} concentrations motivated the Integrated Exposure-Response model (IER) (4), which combined information on PM_{2.5}–mortality associations from nonoutdoor PM_{2.5} sources, including secondhand smoke, household air pollution from use of solid fuels, and active smoking. Specifically, to construct the IER, estimates of the total mass of inhaled particles from each nonoutdoor source were converted into the equivalent concentration in the ambient atmosphere. The IER forms the basis of the estimates of disease burden attributable to PM_{2.5} (e.g., 4 million deaths in 2015) in the global burden of disease (GBD) (1), those of the World Health Organization (WHO) (5), and in the quantification of impacts of policy scenarios on projected improvements in population health burden and evaluation of air-quality standards (6, 7).

By using this approach, stable predictions of the hazard ratio function can be obtained over the entire global range of outdoor PM_{2.5}; however, the IER requires risk information on sources other than outdoor PM_{2.5} and assumes equal toxicity per unit dose across these nonoutdoor sources. Risk assessments of outdoor particles have assumed that toxicity is a function of mass concentration alone (8, 9). The IER extended this assumption to particle sources mainly originating from indoor sources, such as secondhand smoking and heating/cooking, and to particle exposure from active smoking. In addition, the IER assumes that the dosing rate from cigarette smoking, a large intake of particles over repeated short time periods per day, results in the same toxicity as continually breathing the same total dose from the atmosphere per day. Similar assumptions are required for exposure to secondhand smoke and household pollution. For example, the total particle dose from smoking a single cigarette is assumed equivalent to breathing an ambient atmosphere of 667 µg/m^{3} for 24 h (4).

The IER formulation also assumes a counterfactual uncertainty distribution, where the relative risk of morality at any concentration is compared with the counterfactual concentration. The uncertainty distribution is defined as a uniform random variable with lower and upper bounds specified by the average of the minimum (2.4 µg/m^{3}) and fifth percentile (5.9 µg/m^{3}) concentrations of cohort studies where subjects are exposed to relatively low values (3). This definition was adopted due to lack of knowledge about the shape of the concentration–mortality association at these lower levels.

We seek to relax many of the strong assumptions required by the IER by relying solely on studies of outdoor PM_{2.5}. First, we established collaborations between 15 research groups globally that have examined the relationship between long-term exposure to outdoor PM_{2.5} and mortality (10⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–24). Each of these 15 research groups independently conducted analyses to characterize the shapes of PM_{2.5}–mortality associations in their respective cohorts using a hazard ratio function developed for health impact assessment (25). Among these 15 cohorts is a study of Chinese men (10) with long-term outdoor PM_{2.5} exposures up to 84 μg/m^{3}, thus greatly extending the range of exposures observed in cohort studies conducted in high-income countries in Europe and North America. In 2015, 97% of the global population lived in countries whose population-weighted outdoor exposure was <84 μg/m^{3}. Our within-cohort analysis focused on nonaccidental mortality as this outcome represents the total mortality burden of PM_{2.5} exposure and provides enhanced statistical power to characterize the shape of the PM_{2.5}–mortality associations compared with any specific cause of death. Almost all nonaccidental deaths were due to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) and lower respiratory infections (LRIs). We thus have restricted our global estimates of excess deaths to this subgroup of illnesses. We were also able to relax the need to assume a counterfactual uncertainty distribution by directly examining the shape of the concentration–mortality association at relatively low levels included in several cohorts.

To complement information from these 15 cohorts, we also extracted data from the published literature (i.e., hazard ratios between PM_{2.5} and nonaccidental mortality) for an additional 26 cohorts where we did not have access to the subject level information (24, 26⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–33). For the 15 within-cohort analyses, we relaxed the assumption that concentration–mortality associations were linear within each cohort. A linear association between exposure and the logarithm of the baseline hazard ratio was assumed for the remaining 26 cohorts. We then estimated the Global Exposure Mortality Model (GEMM) as a common (possibly nonlinear) hazard ratio model among the 41 cohorts by pooling predictions of the hazard ratio among cohorts over their range of exposure (*SI Appendix*, *SI Methods*), denoted as GEMM NCD+LRI.

For comparison with previous disease burden assessments, we also constructed separate GEMMs for each of the five causes of death that comprise the GBD attributable mortality estimates: ischemic heart disease (IHD), stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung cancer, and LRIs. The hazard ratio and exposure information used by GBD2015 for outdoor air pollution (3) was complemented with data on specific causes of death, hazard ratios, and exposure from those studies where we used the nonaccidental risk information but were not included in the GBD2015 IER models. Four studies (11, 13, 17, 19) were included for LRI, three studies (10, 17, 31) for both IHD and stroke, and two studies (10, 17) for COPD and lung cancer. We assumed that the association between PM_{2.5} and the logarithm of the baseline hazard was linear within each cohort in a manner similar to that used by the IER (4).

We note that almost all (>99%) nonaccidental deaths in the 41 cohorts were due to noncommunicable diseases and LRIs (NCD+LRI). Adult (>25 y) mortality rates based on this subgroup are used when calculating excess mortality attributable to PM_{2.5} exposure for the nonaccidental GEMM. Restriction to NCD+LRI causes of death also addresses the issue that some countries have a much higher proportion of communicable disease mortality compared with the 41 cohorts. We now denote the nonaccidental GEMM as GEMM NCD+LRI and the GEMM for each of the five specific causes of as GEMM 5-COD when referring to the models used to estimate the combined population-attributable fraction based on the five separate causes.

We refit GEMM NCD+LRI and each cause-specific GEMM without the Chinese Male Cohort (10) to examine the sensitivity of our model predictions to this cohort, given that it incorporated a much larger range in exposure than any other study (15–84 μg/m^{3}). We fit age-specific GEMMs for NCD+LRI, IHD, and stroke mortality (*SI Appendix*, *SI Methods*) as cardiovascular risk factors, including PM_{2.5}, decline with age (4).

We estimated excess mortality rates and deaths associated with a 100% reduction in 2015 PM_{2.5} exposures (34) based on the GEMM and the IER model for each country and globally, a burden analysis. We also examined a partial reduction in exposure of 20%, a benefits analysis. PM_{2.5} exposure estimates for 2015 were derived at a 0.1° by 0.1° grid globally based on fusion of satellite based remote sensing information, chemical transport model simulations, and spatially varying calibration to ground monitoring data using hierarchical Bayesian methods (34). The mathematical form of the GEMM and IER are described in *Methods*.

## Results

GEMM NCD+LRI hazard ratio predictions increased with PM_{2.5} concentration, displaying a supralinear association over lower exposures and then a near-linear association at higher concentrations (Fig. 1, *Top*). We used a counterfactual concentration of 2.4 µg/m^{3}, the lowest observed concentration in any of the 41 cohorts (*SI Appendix*, Table S1). Below the counterfactual, we assumed no change in the hazard ratio. GEMM LRI and IHD hazard ratio predictions were larger than those for COPD, lung cancer, and stroke, which were similar to each other (Fig. 1, *Bottom*).

GEMM hazard ratio predictions were larger than those of the IER for all concentrations examined except for concentrations <10 µg/m^{3} for stroke with predictions declining with age for all models (*SI Appendix*, Fig. S1). In each country, the excess PM_{2.5} mortality rate (deaths per 100,000 population) was calculated as the product of the cause-specific baseline mortality rate and population-attributable fraction (1 minus the inverse of the hazard ratio function) for the age-adjusted GEMM NCD+LRI, GEMM 5-COD, and IER models. For each model, we used the same estimates of exposure and baseline mortality rates. Thus, any differences were only due to the choice of hazard ratio model. The larger GEMM hazard ratio predictions resulted in higher country-specific estimates of the excess mortality rates compared with the IER-based estimates (Fig. 2). However, the correlation between excess rate estimates for the IER and GEMM NCD+LRI was high (0.95) and higher still between the IER and GEMM 5-COD (0.98).

We applied the GEMM and IER models for each country and globally to assess the excess mortality burdens related to 2015 exposure estimates (34), a 100% reduction in exposure in each country to the counterfactual exposure, and for a partial rollback of concentrations by 20% in each country, equivalent to achieving the WHO PM_{2.5} air-quality first Interim Target of 35 μg/m^{3} at the global level (benefit analysis). We report these results grouped by global regions (Table 1). The population-weighted average PM_{2.5} concentrations vary among groupings of countries from the lowest in Canada/United States (7.9 µg/m^{3}) and Oceania (8.0 µg/m^{3}) to the highest in China (57.5 µg/m^{3}) and India (74.0 µg/m^{3}). Estimates of the number of excess (averted) deaths based on the GEMM NCD+LRI model were greater than the GEMM 5-COD model and still greater than the IER model for each group of countries, assuming either a 100% exposure reduction or a partial reduction of 20% (Table 1). However, the ratio of averted deaths based on the GEMM 5-COD model to the GEMM NCD+LRI model increased from between the 20% and 100% reduction scenarios, suggesting that the GEMM 5-COD model was capturing a higher percentage of the GEMM NCD+LRI averted deaths for smaller reductions in exposure. The corresponding ratios between either the IER or GEMM 5-COD to the GEMM NCD+LRI decreased from the 100% to 20% reduction scenarios in all regions except the two with the lowest exposures, suggesting that the IER-based estimates were capturing fewer of the GEMM NCD+LRI predicted averted deaths at higher concentrations.

We next examined the sensitivity of the GEMM hazard ratio predictions to the inclusion/exclusion of the Chinese cohort that covered much of the global exposure distribution. The GEMM NCD+LRI was insensitive to the exclusion of the Chinese cohort, as were the GEMM COPD and lung cancer models (*SI Appendix*, Fig. S6). However, both the IHD and stroke GEMM predictions were lower if the Chinese cohort data were not included in the model fitting (*SI Appendix*, Fig. S6). Country-specific estimates of the excess mortality rates were almost perfectly correlated between models, including and excluding the Chinese cohort (0.998), with a 14% average reduction in the estimate of the excess mortality rate among countries when the cohort was not included. Additional sensitivity analyses are presented in *SI Appendix*.

Globally, the GEMM NCD+LRI estimates 8.9 million avoided deaths [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.5–10.3] deaths in 2015. The GEMM 5-COD estimates 6.9 million avoided deaths (95% CI: 4.9–8.5), and the IER estimates 4.0 million avoids deaths (95% CI: 3.3–4.8). We note that even in those countries from which most of the cohorts were conducted (Canada, United States, and Western Europe), the ratio of averted deaths from the IER to GEMM NCD+LRI was 0.40–0.45, based on a 100% exposure reduction (Table 1). A similar ratio was observed globally (0.45).

## Discussion

To address the disease burden attributable to outdoor air pollution, governments and policymakers around the world need accurate estimates of exposure–response functions that relate changes in outdoor air pollution concentrations to changes in health risks. To date, the IER has served this purpose, but this method has several limitations, including the use of exposure/health-risk data from sources other than outdoor air pollution. Here, we demonstrated that stable hazard ratio predictions can be obtained across the global range of PM_{2.5} concentrations using only studies of outdoor air pollution using an alternative hazard ratio model and method of statistical inference (25) compared to that used for the IER (3,4). By using a common statistical approach to characterizing the shape of exposure–response relationships within cohorts and then combined across cohorts, the GEMM provides a detailed examination of the shape of the outdoor exposure–mortality association, spanning the global distribution of exposure. Importantly, the manner in which we constructed the GEMM and characterized its uncertainty (*SI Appendix*, *SI Methods* and Fig. S7) can be directly implemented in currently available computer software used for air-quality health impact assessments, such as those used by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (9), Health Canada (35), and the WHO (36).

One of the most important implications of our method is that the GEMM predicted mortality hazard ratios that were almost always larger than those of the previous IER model, with much larger risks observed at higher PM_{2.5} concentrations (*SI Appendix*, Fig. S1). Specifically the global estimates of mortality attributable to ambient fine particulate air pollution (8.9 million, 95% CI: 7.5–10.3) were 120% higher than previous estimates and suggest comparable impact to the leading global mortality risk factors of diet (10.3 million deaths, 95% CI: 8.8–11.9) and cigarette smoking (6.3 million deaths; 95% CI: 5.7–7.0) (1). The GEMM estimates also suggested that health benefits associated with reductions in PM_{2.5} concentrations are much greater than previously suggested, particularly in areas with elevated concentrations such as India or China (Table 1).

In particular, the IER displayed the most curvature for IHD and stroke, in part due to the inclusion of hazard ratios for active smoking, which are proportionately not much larger than those for outdoor air pollution but are assigned much higher PM_{2.5} exposures (4). Since the GEMM does not rely on information related to active smoking, it is not influenced by these patterns. Similarly, the GEMM does not rely on information from secondhand smoking or household heating and cooking studies. Collectively, these additional sources of exposure information included in the IER reduce hazard ratio estimates compared with the GEMM method, which relies only on data from cohort studies of outdoor air pollution.

A second important feature of our GEMM method relates to the fact that it incorporates outdoor air pollution data across the most of the global exposure range, covering 97% of the global population, owing to the inclusion of a cohort study in China (10). Importantly, our sensitivity analyses suggest that the GEMM was not sensitive to our selection of an ensemble of two models from the Chinese cohort for NCD+LRI causes, but was somewhat sensitive for IHD and stroke mortality (*SI Appendix*, Fig. S6). Moving forward, it is important that additional cohort studies be conducted in these higher-exposure environments to corroborate the results of the Chinese cohort with regard to both the shape and the magnitude of health risks associated with PM_{2.5}.

Our detailed analyses using subject-level data in 15 cohorts also provides direct evidence to characterize the shape of the exposure–response relationship at relatively low concentrations, an innovation of direct relevance to setting of air-quality standards. Ten of the 15 cohorts had exposures less than the WHO ambient air-quality guideline of 10 µg/m^{3}, and in each case we observed an increase in the hazard ratio between their respective minimum concentrations and 10 µg/m^{3}. Such evidence would not have been possible without these detailed within-cohort analyses. In comparison, the GBD2015 version of the IER model incorporated a counterfactual uncertainty distribution characterized by a uniform random variable with lower/upper bounds of 2.4 and 5.9 µg/m^{3}, respectively. These limits were based on the average of the minimum and fifth percentiles of the exposure distributions among cohorts with relatively low concentrations (3). This counterfactual distribution was intended to describe uncertainty in the shape at low concentrations given absence of direct evidence.

Traditionally, quantitative estimates of the global mortality impacts of outdoor air pollution have been based on five specific causes of death, including lung cancer, IHD, COPD, stroke, and LRI. In this study, estimates of excess deaths based on baseline mortality rates for NCDs plus LRIs (NCD+LRI) were 30% higher than those based on the five specific causes of death using the GEMM. This was due, in part, to the lower baseline mortality rate for the five specific causes of death compared with NCD+LRI (52%). However, this observation also suggests that exposure to PM_{2.5} is contributing to mortality from causes other than the five examined here and in the GBD (1). This is an interesting finding which supports emerging evidence that other diseases not yet included in most impact analyses are related to PM_{2.5} exposure (37⇓–39).

In summary, the GEMM method presented in this study addresses many of the limitations associated with the previous IER model and provides a means of quantifying the health impacts of outdoor air pollution. Importantly, this approach suggests that the health benefits of reducing PM_{2.5} are likely much larger than previously assumed, owing to much stronger relationships between air pollution and mortality at higher concentrations. The implications of this finding are particularly significant for countries with the highest air-pollution concentrations, as the potential health benefits of air-quality improvements in these areas are larger than previously recognized.

## Methods

税收增幅为何“前高后低”

The IER model has the form IER(*z*) = 1 + π(1 − exp{−φ*z*^{δ}}), where *z* = max(0, PM_{2.5} − *cf*) with *cf* ∼ U(2.4,5.9) denoting a uniform uncertainty distribution for the counterfactual, assuming no association <2.4 µg/m^{3}. The maximum hazard ratio is 1 + π, with the rate of increase for low concentrations governed by φ and for higher concentrations by δ. The unknown parameters are estimated by Bayesian methods, assuming noninformative gamma distributed priors using the computer program Stan (40). The IER was designed to estimate health burden associated not only with ambient PM_{2.5} exposures, but also secondhand smoke and household air pollution; thus, the inclusion of risk information from these other particle types. IERs can take sublinear, near-linear, supralinear, and sigmodal shapes depending on the values of these parameters. For the 2015 version of the IER, a random effects error structure was assumed with random effects specific to each particle source (outdoor air pollution, secondhand smoke, household air pollution, and active smoking) (3). This additional risk information assisted in obtaining more stable risk predictions with narrower uncertainty intervals under the fully Bayesian modeling framework.

L2研究总监科林o吉尔伯特表示，这一系列合作标志着创新的摇篮与时尚的发源地终于开始牵手。吉尔伯特说，要解决可穿戴领域的难题，缺少的不仅仅是设计这一种要素，但设计确实是这个领域期待的元素。这份报告的调查显示，超过一半的受访者希望拥有看上去更像珠宝的可穿戴设备，62%的受访者更喜欢腕戴式设备。

社交时我找不到合适的话题

网友“Xuelili”说：“作为一个土生土长的陕西人，我认为孙俪演得很好。她上蹿下跳的感觉，和典型的陕西妹子一模一样。”

两个抢手在讽刺杂志查理周刊屠杀了12个人，谢里夫库阿奇和他的兄弟塞得，他们可能就是出国“接受屠杀训练并散播恐怖”的人中的两个。

'It's been low for a while, says Lee (last year it was ranked 196 out of 200). 'What probably pushed it to the bottom is that several things got worse job prospects decreased, the average salary continued to fall, and work hours continued to rise. Those factors also make the job more stressful.'

在《渴望生活》这张专辑的第一首歌《爱》中，拉娜·德雷唱着“过去的一切造就了今天的你，但未来由你决定”。

几家与韩国有关系的机构已经感受到了北京方面对萨德计划的怒火。上个月，由于乐天(Lotte)出让土地用于部署萨德平台，中国官方新闻机构新华社(Xinhua)向乐天发出了强硬警告。乐天是韩国最大的企业之一。

We motivated the development of the GEMM through the Log-Linear (LL) model, as this is the most commonly used model to estimate excess deaths from exposure to ambient PM_{2.5} (8, 9). The LL model has the form LL(*z*) = exp{β*z*}, where *z* = *max*(*0*, *PM*_{2.5} *− cf*), with *cf* representing the counterfactual PM_{2.5} concentration assuming no association below *cf* and unit hazard ratio when *PM*_{2.5} = *cf*. GEMM is an extension of the LL model by including nonlinear shapes defined by transformations, *T*(*z*), of concentration. Our model has the form: *GEMM*(*z*) = exp{θ*T*(*z*)}. We consider transformations that cover the variety of shapes modeled by the IER, which we also suggest are useful for health impact assessment. We describe two forms of the model, one when analyzing within cohort information and another for pooling hazard ratio predictions among cohorts.

The association between concentrations of PM_{2.5} and mortality for the analysis of a specific cohort is described by a class of hazard ratio functions (25): *R*(*z*) = exp{θT(*z*)}, where *T*(*z*) = *f*(*z*)ω(*z*), with *f*(*z*) = *z* or *f*(*z*) = log(*z + 1*), such that *R*(*z*) *= 1* when *z = 0* for either form of *f*(*z*). Here, ω(*z*) = 1/(1 + exp{−(*z* − µ)/(τr)}) is a logistic weighting function of *z* and two parameters (µ,τ) with *r* representing the range in the pollutant concentrations. The parameter τ controls the amount of curvature in ω with µ controlling the shape. The set of values of (*f*,µ,τ) define a shape of the mortality–PM_{2.5} association. The estimation method is based on a routine that selects multiple values of (*f*,µ,τ), and, given these values, estimates of θ and its SE are obtained by using standard computer software that fit the Cox proportional hazards model (2). We can use standard computer software since we have formulated the estimation problem as a transformation of concentration, *T*(*z*) = *f*(*z*)ω(*z*), and a single unknown parameter θ. An ensemble model is calculated by the weighted average of the predictions of all models examined at any concentration with weights defined by the likelihood function value. Uncertainty estimates of the ensemble model predictions are obtained by bootstrap methods, which incorporate both sampling and model shape uncertainty (25). For large negative values of µ, ω(*z*) ∼ 1, and in such cases, *T*(*z*) ∼ *z* when *f*(*z*) = *z*, and *T*(*z*) ∼ log(*z* + 1) when *f*(*z*) = log(*z* + 1). We thus obtain a family of shapes including approximately linear, log linear, supralinear and sublinear, and S-shaped in concentration. Details of the set of values of (*f*,µ,τ) and the estimation routine are described elsewhere (25).

We define a modification of the hazard ratio model used for the analysis of subject level data within each cohort as our common model among cohorts: *R*(*z*) = exp{θ*T*(*z*)}, where *T*(*z*) = log(1 + *z*/α)ω(*z*). We have replaced the two forms of *f*(*z*) that we used in the analysis of the subject level within cohort data by a single mathematical form log(1 + *z*/α) defined by an additional parameter α. Here, α controls the amount of curvature in *R* with less curvature for larger values of α. For larger values of α, the model is near linear for low concentrations and for low values of µ. However, changes in the hazard ratio decline with increasing concentrations beyond the range of the data (*SI Appendix*, Fig. S9). We do this so that predictions of the hazard ratio beyond the observed exposure range have a logarithmic form with diminishing changes in association as exposure increases. This structure limits the size of the predicted hazard ratio over concentration ranges where we have no observations. Estimates of *R*(*z*) are obtained by specifying values in the parameters (α,µ,τ) that define the shape of the transformations and given these shapes, θ is estimated by using standard computer software. An ensemble estimate is then constructed of all of the shapes examined weighted by their respective likelihood values. Bootstrap methods were used to obtain uncertainty intervals (*SI Appendix*, *SI Methods*). We constrained the amount of curvature in our fitted model by restricting the selection of values of (α,µ,τ) (*SI Appendix*, *SI Methods*).

The ensemble model predictions are a weighted average of all models examined. To simplify the presentation of our results and their use for burden/benefits analyses, we suggest fitting a single algebraic function of the same form as the GEMM to the ensemble model predictions over the concentration range of interest for health burden assessment. In this work, we use the concentration interval 2.4–84 µg/m^{3} by 0.1-µg/m^{3} increments. We simplified the model somewhat by absorbing the concentration range *r* with the parameter τ by setting *r*τ = ν. We then estimated the parameters by standard nonlinear regression methods [R routine nlsLM from the package “minpack.lm” (41)]. We attribute all of the uncertainty in the ensemble model prediction to θ by first regressing the SE of the log*R*(*z*) predictions among the bootstrap samples at each concentration on the log*R*(*z*) predictions themselves. The slope of this regression is designated as the SE of our estimate of θ. The adequacy of our model approximation is examined by plotting the ensemble and uncertainty intervals overlaid with the approximate model average and approximate uncertainty intervals (*SI Appendix*, Fig. S7).

Since the hazard ratio declines with age for cardiovascular risk factors, such as PM_{2.5}, we constructed age-specific GEMMs in a manner similar to that used by the GBD program (1) (*SI Appendix*, *SI Methods*). We did this for the GEMM NCD+LRI and the IHD and stroke GEMMs. We only age-adjusted the proportion of cardiovascular deaths in each of the 41 cohorts for age for the GEMM NCD+LRI (*SI Appendix*, *SI Methods*). Thus, age-adjusted GEMM NCD+LRI displayed less variation than those for IHD and stroke (*SI Appendix*, Fig. S1).

Estimates of excess deaths were determined by the product of the size of country population, the age-specific annual mortality rate, and the population attribution fraction (one minus the inverse of the relative risk function). We interpret the hazard ratio functions obtained from cohort studies as relative risks to use the population attributable risk definition since the annual baseline mortality rates are small (*SI Appendix*).

## Footnotes

- ↵
^{1}To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: mietek.szyszkowicz{at}canada.ca.

- Pink, LeBron James, Selena Gomez, Ian Somerhalder, Jay-Z and Beyonce, Ben Affleckalso made the list.

网上的撤稿公告共列出了107篇论文及524位作者，他们几乎都是中国临床肿瘤专家。所涉及的医院都是顶级公立机构。

Last but not least, no matter what kind of personality you are, be positive and stay healthy!

Tencent, with an estimated value of $44.7 billion, was crowned this year's Most Valuable Chinese brand on a list released by the Hurun Institute on Thursday, marking the second time in a row it came up on top. - 网购家具困扰多 7招傍身规避风险
中化集团原副总经理杜克平被“双开”

Data deposition: Data and code related to this paper are available at 2018年：环保将强制成为涂料行业新门槛.

This article contains supporting information online at 迷你剧集/电影类最佳男配角：斯特林?K?布朗(Sterling K Brown)，《美国罪案故事：公诉辛普森》(The People v. O. J. Simpson: American Crime Story).

- 欧美换灯旺季来临 LED业8月有望景气翻盘

This open access article is distributed under The latest commerce ministry figures do not include real estate purchases by individuals, many of whom exploit loopholes in China's capital control regime to obtain foreign currency. But the foreign exchange regulator has recently moved to close such loopholes, notably by tightening control of forex purchases by individuals, who are allowed to exchange $50,000 worth of renminbi for foreign currency each year..

## References

- ↵
- 中国石墨烯市场规模2015年增长336%至610万美元

- ↵
- Cox DR

- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- World Health Organization

- ↵
- Qin Y, et al.

- ↵
- Lacey FG,
- Henze DK,
- Lee CJ,
- van Donkelaar A,
- Martin RV

- ↵
- 安徽部分三四线楼市回暖 合肥调控新政效果初显

- ↵
- 珠三角小微企业融资调查：没有房产抵押也不再寸步难行

- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Thurston GD, et al.

- ↵
- ↵
- Villeneuve PJ, et al.

- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Pinault LL, et al.

- ↵
- ↵
- Pinault L, et al.

- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Pope CA III, et al.

_{2.5}air pollution in the United States: An analysis of a national prospective cohort. Air Qual Atmos Health 11:245–252. - ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Nasari M, et al.

- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Tseng E, et al.

- ↵
- ↵
- Bentayeb M, et al.

- ↵
- Shaddick G, et al.

- ↵
- Judek S,
- Stieb D,
- Jovic B,
- Edwards B

- ↵
- World Health Organization

Best chances: Sally Hawkins is only a fraction behind current best actress favorite Frances McDormand.. Accessed January 12, 2018. - ↵
- ↵
- Thurston GD, et al.

- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- R Core Team

## Citation Manager Formats

## Sign up for Article Alerts

## Article Classifications

- Biological Sciences
- Environmental Sciences

- Social Sciences
- Environmental Sciences